Writing StudioPersonal and Reflective Writing

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Editing for truth

You will revise a personal piece so that it is true to your experience, fair to the people in it, and as clear as you can make it.

Do this first

Highlight every sentence that states something about another person: what they said, did, thought or meant. Next to each, write “know” or “guess”. Rewrite each guess as your perception (“I thought she was angry”).

Steps

0 of 6 steps done

  1. Check the facts you can check

    Dates, places, names, quotations and the order of events can often be checked against emails, photos, records or other people's memories. Memory is reconstructive, so even confident memories can be wrong.

  2. Signal memory and inference

    Where you cannot check, say so: “as I remember it”, “I think she said”, “I assumed”. Reconstructed dialogue is accepted in memoir when it is faithful to what was said; inventing events or merging people without telling the reader is not.

  3. Test fairness to others

    Read each passage about another person as if they were reading it. Check whether you show them as a whole person, and whether any detail exposes them without serving the piece. Change or remove identifying details where the point survives without them.

  4. Cut what protects your image

    Find sentences that make you look better than you were or over-explain your reasons. Cut the defensive clauses and keep the admission.

  5. Edit assessed reflections for evidence

    Every claim of learning needs an example: “I improved my handovers” needs what you did differently and how you know it worked. Check that theory is cited correctly in the required style.

  6. Then edit for clarity

    Only now tighten the sentences: cut filler such as “I feel that” and “in terms of”, vary sentence length, and read aloud. Check the word limit, required headings and referencing style last.

Templates

Truth audit

Claim: [sentence from the draft]
Type: [fact I can check / memory / inference about someone else]
Check: [email, photo, record, person asked, not checkable]
Decision: [keep / mark as memory / reframe as my perception / cut]

Phrases for honest uncertainty

As I remember it, [event].
I may have the details wrong, but I am sure that [what you are certain of].
I assumed [assumption]; I never found out whether [what remains unknown].
I have changed [names / places / details] to protect [whose] privacy.

Evidence for a claim of learning

Claim: I [learned / improved / now understand] [what].
Evidence: When [later situation], I [did something differently].
Result: [what happened, or feedback received].
Supporting source: [Author (Year)], who argues [point].

Check your draft

0 of 8 done

In your field

Check that technical details in a reflection (values, procedures, software versions) are accurate, because a factual slip undermines the whole account. Edit for concision and clear cause and effect.

Read more about this stage

Memory research has shown that recall is reconstructive: each time we remember an event, we rebuild it, and confident memories can still be inaccurate. Memoirists handle this by checking what they can and signalling what they cannot.

Conventions differ by venue. Many memoirs include an author's note on changed names, compressed timelines or reconstructed dialogue. Journalistic personal essays usually hold to stricter standards, and some outlets fact-check personal essays before publication.